4.7 Review

Circulating nucleic acids as liquid biopsies for disease prediction, screening and diagnosis

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-CHEMISTRY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11426-023-1727-9

关键词

cliec acids; liquid biopsy; biomarkers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liquid biopsy using molecular information in body fluids is an important tool for early diagnosis and treatment of various diseases. Blood, urine, and bile can be used as samples for diagnosis. With the development of gene sequencing and bioinformatics technology, genetic, epigenetic, and fragtomics alterations in cfDNA as well as the expression level of miRNA and cf-mRNA can be quantified, providing insights into disease pathogenesis.
Liquid biopsy used molecular information in body liquid to perform early diagnosis, screening, monitoring, prognosis, and treatment of various diseases. Circulating free nucleic acids (cfNA) are important diagnostic biomarkers, providing a window to accurately and immediately observe the body's vital activity status. With the development of gene sequencing technology and bioinformatics technology, genetic, epigenetic, and fragtomics alterations that can be detected in cfDNA, as well as the expression level of miRNA and cf-mRNA can be quantified, this can reflect its tissue origin, gene regulation, genome evolution, and disease pathogenesis. This review focuses on the clinical utility of cfNA in different body liquids (blood, urine, bile), and discusses the diagnostic efficacy and accuracy of cfNA as diagnostic biomarkers in a variety of diseases. Blood is widely used to diagnose various tissue lesions for liquid biopsies as a body fluid circulating throughout the body, reflecting the state of the entire body. Bile and urine, as local circulating body fluids, can better reflect the changing state of tissues around the biliary tract and tissues around the bladder, respectively. In addition, normalized sample preservation, cfNA extraction, and detection procedures will help the practical application of cfNA in the clinic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据