4.7 Article

Polythiophene solar cells processed from non-halogenated solvent with 15.68% efficiency

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-CHEMISTRY
卷 66, 期 8, 页码 2347-2353

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11426-023-1695-x

关键词

polythiophenes; organic solar cells; high-efficiency; non-halogenated solvent; aggregation control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, highly efficient PT solar cells processed from a non-halogenated solvent were reported. The power conversion efficiency reached 15.68%, which is the highest efficiency record for non-halogenated processed PT solar cells to date. The appropriate solution temperature contributed to enhanced charge transfer efficiency, balanced hole electron mobility, and reduced trap-assisted recombination. These results provide valuable implications for improving the efficiency of PT solar cells via environmentally-friendly processing.
Polythiophenes (PTs) are prospective polymer donors for large-scale manufacturing and industrialization owing to their simple structures and low synthetic cost. However, the fabrication of PT solar cells depends on highly toxic chlorinated solvents, and less research has been done on the use of more environmentally friendly non-halogenated solvents. Herein, highly efficient PT solar cells based on top-performance polythiophene, P5TCN-F25, processed from a non-halogenated solvent are reported by delicate aggregation control. A power conversion efficiency of up to 15.68% was achieved by depositing the active layer from a hot o-xylene solution, which is the record efficiency of non-halogenated processed PT solar cells up to date. The appropriate solution temperature is beneficial to the formation of ordered polymer stacking and desirable phase separation size, which thereby contributes to enhanced charge transfer efficiency, more balanced hole electron mobility, and reduced trap-assisted recombination. These results provide valuable implications for improving the efficiency of PT solar cells via environmentally-friendly processing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据