4.5 Article

Global practitioner assessment and management of mental fatigue and mental recovery in high-performance sport: A & nbsp;need for evidence-based best-practice guidelines

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sms.14491

关键词

athlete management; cognition; cognitive load; fatigue; high-performance; human performance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the knowledge, beliefs, monitoring processes, management strategies, perceived responsibility, sources of evidence, and challenges related to assessing the mental fatigue and mental recovery of athletes in high-performance sport. The results showed that only a small percentage of practitioners were knowledgeable about these concepts, and there were challenges in implementing evidence-based assessment and management practices.
Background: Mental fatigue and mental recovery have gained scientific attention in relation to sporting performance, yet best practice assessment and management methods are lacking. A greater understanding of current knowledge and practices in high-performance sport are necessary.Objective: To understand the contemporary knowledge, beliefs, monitoring processes, management strategies, perceived responsibility, sources of evidence, and challenges, when assessing the mental fatigue and mental recovery of athletes in high-performance sport.Methods: A mixed-methods survey approach obtained information from 156 multi-disciplinary high-performance sport practitioners. Descriptive outputs were reported and potential differences between key concepts were detected using Wilcoxon-signed rank analysis. Thematic analysis interpreted open-text responses.Results: Only 11.5% and 5.1% of respondents indicated they were very knowledgeable about mental fatigue and mental recovery, respectively. Knowledge (p < 0.001) and confidence in application (p = 0.001) were significantly greater for mental fatigue than mental recovery. Nearly all respondents perceived mental fatigue and mental recovery impacted training and competition performance, with a greater negative impact during competition (p < 0.001). A limited number of respondents reported deliberate assessment (31.1%) or management (51.2%) of mental fatigue and mental recovery. A combination of sources of evidence were used to inform practice, with common challenges to implementation including staff knowledge, athlete-buy in, time-availability, and a lack of evidence. Practitioners reported that assessing and managing mental fatigue and mental recovery was multi-disciplinary in nature.Conclusion: Practitioners reported that mental fatigue and mental recovery did impact performance, yet this was not reflected in the implementation of evidence-based assessment and management practices in high-performance sport.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据