4.5 Review

Application of radiomics and machine learning to thyroid diseases in nuclear medicine: a systematic review

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11154-023-09822-4

关键词

Thyroid; Machine learning; Radiomics; Texture analysis; Positron emission tomography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Growing evidences show the role of radiomics and machine learning in the assessment of thyroid diseases. This systematic review analyzes the diagnostic performances of these technologies in this setting. Seventeen studies were included, demonstrating the promising role of radiomics and machine learning in the evaluation of thyroid diseases. However, further validation in multicentric studies is needed to translate these approaches into clinical practice.
Background: In the last years growing evidences on the role of radiomics and machine learning (ML) applied to different nuclear medicine imaging modalities for the assessment of thyroid diseases are starting to emerge. The aim of this systematic review was therefore to analyze the diagnostic performances of these technologies in this setting. Methods: A wide literature search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science databases was made in order to find relevant published articles about the role of radiomics or ML on nuclear medicine imaging for the evaluation of different thyroid diseases. Results: Seventeen studies were included in the systematic review. Radiomics and ML were applied for assessment of thyroid incidentalomas at (18) F-FDG PET, evaluation of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules, assessment of thyroid cancer and classification of thyroid diseases using nuclear medicine techniques. Conclusion: Despite some intrinsic limitations of radiomics and ML may have affect the results of this review, these technologies seem to have a promising role in the assessment of thyroid diseases. Validation of preliminary findings in multicentric studies is needed to translate radiomics and ML approaches in the clinical setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据