4.7 Article

The pelletization and torrefaction of coffee grounds, garden chaff and rapeseed straw

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 210, 期 -, 页码 346-354

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.04.016

关键词

Biomass; Pellets; Torrefaction; Pellets ' quality; Fuel; Ash melting

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the effect of torrefaction on pellets made from coffee grounds, garden chaff, and rapeseed straw. The results show that the torrefaction process increases the heat of combustion and carbon content of the pellets, as well as the ash content. This provides insight into the energy use of waste biomass for pelletization and torrefaction.
Waste biomass pelletization is a suitable process for obtaining energy dense solid fuel. If the pellets are further processed by torrefaction, both their qualitative and energy parameters are changed. Therefore, the objective of this study is to investigate the effect of the torrefaction process on pellets made from coffee grounds, garden chaff and rapeseed straw. Mechanical parameters, such as the pellet durability index, the wettability index of the pellets, their water moisture resistance, hardness, or specific and bulk density were determined for evaluation. Furthermore, pellet energy parameters such as the heat of combustion, calorific value, or elemental analysis were compared. Pelletization of the above-mentioned waste biomass and the torrefaction of the pellets were carried out in pilot plants. The first results showed that the torrefaction process for all samples increased the values of the heat of combustion or the values of the carbon content. The energy value of the pellets increases. The higher heating value of torrefied coffee ground pellets reached 26 MJ kg-1. The ash content also increases with these values. A simple energy balance has been carried out. Therefore, the study shows an insight into the energy use of coffee grounds and chaff from the garden compared to the results of the rapeseed straw pellets for the pelleti-zation and torrefication process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据