4.7 Article

Thermodynamic and economic performance evaluations of double-stage organic flash cycle using hydrofluoroolefins (HFOs)

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 220, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119593

关键词

Organic flash cycle; Hydrofluorolefin; Thermodynamic performance; Performance evaluation; Geothermal energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the thermodynamic, exergy, and economic performance of a double-stage organic flash cycle (DOFC) using ten eco-friendly hydrofluoroolefins. The influences of key parameters on performance are analyzed, and the advantages of DOFC over single-stage type are quantified.
Organic flash cycle is an important way to achieve geothermal power generation. Double-stage organic flash cycle (DOFC) has two flash processes, remarkably enhancing the heat matching effect of heat absorption process compared to single-stage type. Working fluid is an important factor influencing the performance superiority of DOFC. However, traditional organic fluids are being phased out due to environmental requirements, the newtype hydrofluoroolefins are emerging with good environmental performance. For new-type hydrofluoroolefins, the characteristics of DOFC are unclear and its advantages over single-stage type need to be quantified. This work evaluates the thermodynamic, exergy and economic performance of DOFC using ten eco-friendly hydrofluoroolefins. Influences of key parameters on thermodynamic and economic performance are analyzed. For hydrofluoroolefins, the superiorities of DOFC over single-stage type were quantitatively evaluated. Results show that the advantages of DOFC will become greater at the lower heat source temperature and the lower critical temperature of hydrofluoroolefins. R513A shows the greatest advantages of DOFC over single-stage type, and the maximum relative increment in the net power is 111.2 % and the maximum relative decrement in specific investment cost is 49.5 %. The optimum hydrofluoroolefin is R1366mzz(Z) with a net power of 348.29 kW and a specific investment cost of 7.88 k$& sdot;kW- 1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据