4.7 Article

Using biochemical methane potential results for the economic optimization of continuous anaerobic digestion systems: the effect of substrates' synergy

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 211, 期 -, 页码 296-306

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.04.125

关键词

Co-digestion; Modeling; Techno-economic evaluation; Decision making; Biochemical methane potential; Anaerobic digestion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to mathematically model anaerobic digestion in batch systems to analyze the potential synergies between complementary substrates. The results showed that a mixture ratio of 70:30 for olive mill wastewater and liquid cow manure achieved a maximum net profit of 16 euro/m3reactor/d, ensuring the sustainability of the process.
During the processing of raw agricultural materials from the primary sector, large quantities of by-products with high chemical energy content are produced. Some of these are olive mill wastewater (OMW), cheese whey (CW), and liquid cow manure (LCM). Anaerobic digestion is a promising, environmentally friendly process for the energy valorization of agro-industrial and livestock by-products. The purpose of this study was the mathematical modeling of anaerobic digestion in batch systems, aiming to quantify possible synergies occurring between complementary substrates. The analysis was based on using biochemical methane potential data to predict the optimum hydraulic retention time (HRT) under steady-state conditions of continuous systems, for different substrate ratios. The objective function for HRT optimization was based on maximizing the process profit and included technoeconomic parameters, allowing the comparison of the different substrate ratios that can be used in the feedstock. The co-digestion with a mixture ratio of OMW:LCM equal to 70:30 proved very satisfactory for the sustainability of the process, exhibiting a maximum net profit of 16 euro/m3reactor/d for a plant capacity of 10 m3feed/d.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据