4.8 Review

Recent advances of carbon-based additives in anaerobic digestion: A review

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113536

关键词

Anaerobic digestion; Biochar; Activated carbon; Methane; DIET

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a crucial technology for the treatment of organic wastes, but there are still challenges such as low digestibility and slow reaction kinetics in practical implementation, limiting bio-product production. Carbon-based additives (CAs), particularly biochar and activated carbon (AC), have shown great potential in enhancing AD performance by facilitating direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET) and adjusting microorganisms. In this review, the research advancements in the use of CAs in AD systems are comprehensively summarized, covering the construction of CAs, their macro-behaviors, micro-mechanisms, and hybrid strategies. Furthermore, future modifications and applications of CAs in AD systems are discussed.
Anaerobic digestion (AD) is one of the paramount technologies for organic wastes treatment. However, there still remain intractable issues including low digestibility and sluggish reaction kinetics in its practical implementation, leading to limited bio-product production. Recently, carbon-based additives (CAs) have aroused great attentions for enhanced AD performance by establishing direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET) and adjusting the functional microorganisms due to their large specific surface area and high conductivity. However, such inherent physicochemical capabilities of CAs and its specific role in AD have not been fully exploited. In this review, we detailedly summarize the research advances of biochar and activated carbon (AC) as additives in AD system, which are combed in terms of structure construction of CAs, macro-behaviors of CAs, micro-mechanisms of CAs and hybrid strategy. Finally, perspectives regarding future modification and application of CAs in AD system are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据