4.7 Article

Reliability analysis and optimal redundancy for a satellite power supply system based on a new dynamic k-out-of-n: G model

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109317

关键词

Reliability; Markov renewal process; Dynamic programming; Dynamic k-out-of-n; G System

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, a new dynamic k-out-of-n:G model is proposed to describe the characteristics of power supply systems in satellites or space stations. The model considers dynamic mechanisms, such as the random process of the failure threshold k and the dynamic decline rate of undamaged channels depending on k. The reliability of the system is derived analytically assuming the channel lifetime follows an exponential distribution, while a simulation method is used for other cases. The optimal redundancy of channels is proposed based on the evaluation of reliability by minimizing the weight of the power supply system under a constraint.
As an important system in satellites or space stations, a power supply system (PSS) is used to support the work of various electrical devices via power supply channels. A PSS fails once the number of undamaged channels is smaller than the number of devices that currently require power supply. A channel may fail only when it powers a device. To describe these characteristics of PSSs, a new dynamic k-out-of -n: G model is developed in this work by considering the following dynamic mechanisms. First, the failure threshold k is assumed to be a random process rather than a fixed value. Second, the decline rate of the number of undamaged channels is dynamic and depends on k. For the new model, a closed-form solution of reliability is derived under the assumption that the channel lifetime follows an exponential distribution. For other cases, a simulation method is employed to evaluate the lifetime of the system. Based on the evaluation of reliability, the optimal redundancy of channels is proposed by minimizing the weight of a PSS under a constraint of reliability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据