4.7 Article

Photo-induced synthesis of star poly(DL-Lactide)-templated Au and Ag nanoparticles and evaluation of their catalytic performance

期刊

REACTIVE & FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS
卷 194, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2023.105772

关键词

Star polymer; Cholic acid; Silver; Gold nanoparicles; Poly(DL-Lactide); Heterogeneous catalysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, monodispersed gold and silver nanoparticles were synthesized using cholic acid functionalized star poly(DL-lactide) as a capping and reducing agent. The synthesized materials were found to be effective heterogeneous catalysts for the reduction reaction.
In this report, photochemical synthesis of monodispersed gold (Au) and silver (Ag) nanoparticles (NPs) was reported using cholic acid functionalized star poly(DL-lactide) (CA-(PDLLA)) as a capping and reducing agent. CA-(PDLLA) was synthesized by ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of DL-lactide with a feed ratio of 1:120 (cholic acid: DL-lactide). The molecular weight of CA-(PDLLA) was measured by using the gel permeation chromatography (GPC) technique. The thermal properties of the polymer and its nanocomposite materials were studied by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The optical properties of Ag and Au NPs were studied by UV-visible absorption spectroscopy. Morphological studies and size of the polymer-nanocomposites were assessed by using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) techniques. The percentage composition of Au and Ag present in the polymernanocomposites was calculated using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopic (EDX) analysis. Finally, the synthesized polymer-metal nanocomposites were used as heterogeneous catalysts for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol (4-NP) to 4-aminophenol (4-AP) as a model reaction and the apparent rate constant (kapp) values of CA-(PDLLA)AuNPs and CA-(PDLLA)-AgNPs were found to be 5.76 x 10-4 s-1 and 19.7 x 10-4 s- 1, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据