4.7 Article

A bright year for tidal disruptions

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1394

关键词

accretion, accretion discs; galaxies: active; galaxies: nuclei; X-rays: galaxies

资金

  1. NASA [NNX14AQ68G]
  2. NSF [AST-1410950]
  3. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  4. NASA [NNX14AQ68G, 674222] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When a star is tidally disrupted by a supermassive black hole (SMBH), roughly half of its mass falls back to the SMBH at super-Eddington rates. As this gas is tenuously gravitationally bound and unable to cool radiatively, only a small fraction f(in) << 1 may accrete, with the majority instead becoming unbound in an outflow of velocity similar to 10(4) km s(-1). The outflow spreads laterally as it expands to large radii, encasing the SMBH and blocking the inner disc's EUV/X-ray radiation, which becomes trapped in a radiation-dominated nebula. Ionizing nebular radiation heats the inner edge of the ejecta, converting the emission to optical/near-UV wavelengths where photons more readily escape due to the lower opacity. This can explain the unexpectedly low and temporally constant effective temperatures of optically discovered tidal disruption event (TDE) flares. For high-mass SMBHs, M-center dot greater than or similar to 10(7) M-circle dot, the ejecta can become fully ionized at an earlier stage, or for a wider range of viewing angles, producing a TDE flare accompanied by thermal X-ray emission. The peak optical luminosity is suppressed as the result of adiabatic losses in the inner disc wind when M-center dot << 10(7) M-circle dot, possibly contributing to the unexpected dearth of optical TDEs in galaxies with low-mass SMBHs. In the classical picture, where f(in) approximate to 1, TDEs de-spin supermassive SMBHs and cap their maximum spins well below theoretical accretion physics limits. This cap is relaxed in our model, and existing Fe K alpha spin measurements provide preliminary evidence that f(in) < 1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据