Eye movements during motor imagery and execution reveal different visuomotor control strategies in manual interception

Previous research has investigated the degree of congruency in gaze metrics between action execution (AE) and motor imagery (MI) for similar manual tasks. Although eye movement dynamics seem to be limited to relatively simple actions toward static objects, there is little evidence of how gaze parameters change during imagery as a function of more dynamic spatial and temporal task demands. This study examined the similarities and differences in eye movements during AE and MI for an interception task. Twenty-four students were asked to either mentally simulate or physically intercept a moving target on a computer display. Smooth pursuit, saccades, and response time were compared between the two conditions. The results show that MI was characterized by higher smooth pursuit gain and duration while no meaningful differences were found in the other parameters. The findings indicate that eye movements during imagery are not simply a duplicate of what happens during actual performance. Instead, eye movements appear to vary as a function of the interaction between visuomotor control strategies and task demands.

Automated summary

Previous research has focused on the congruency in gaze metrics between action execution (AE) and motor imagery (MI), with limited evidence on the changes in gaze parameters during imagery with more dynamic task demands. This study compared eye movements during AE and MI for an interception task, and found that MI was characterized by higher smooth pursuit gain and duration, while other parameters showed no meaningful differences.