4.6 Article

Individual differences in seated resting heart rate are associated with multisensory perceptual function in older adults

期刊

PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14430

关键词

aging; cardiovascular; multisensory; sound-induced flash illusion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is evidence suggesting that cardiovascular activity can affect sensory processing and cognition, which are known to change with age. However, it is uncertain whether cardiovascular activity influences the precision of unisensory and multisensory temporal perception in older adults. This study found that faster resting heart rate was associated with better differentiation of two visual flashes and increased susceptibility to the audio-visual Sound Induced Flash Illusion (SIFI) in older adults.
There is evidence that cardiovascular function can influence sensory processing and cognition, which are known to change with age. However, whether the precision of unisensory and multisensory temporal perception is influenced by cardiovascular activity in older adults is uncertain. We examined whether seated resting heart rate (RHR) was associated with unimodal visual and auditory temporal discrimination as well as susceptibility to the audio-visual Sound Induced Flash Illusion (SIFI) in a large sample of older adults (N = 3232; mean age = 64.17 years, SD = 7.74, range = 50-93; 56% female) drawn from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA). Faster seated RHR was associated with better discretization of two flashes (but not two beeps) and increased SIFI susceptibility when the audio-visual stimuli were presented close together in time but not at longer audio-visual temporal offsets. Our findings suggest a significant relationship between cardiovascular activity and the precision of visual and audio-visual temporal perception in older adults, thereby providing novel evidence for a link between cardiovascular function and perceptual function in aging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据