4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Fluidized bed ODH of ethane to ethylene over VOx-MoOx/γ-Al2O3 catalyst: Desorption kinetics and catalytic activity

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 278, 期 -, 页码 207-216

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.09.114

关键词

Fluidized bed ODH; Ethylene; Vanadium oxide; Molybdenum oxide; NH3-TPD kinetics; Cycle TPR/TPO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxidative dehydrogenation (ODH) of ethane is studied in a gas phase oxygen free conditions using a VOx-MoOx/gamma-Al2O3 catalyst which also acts as a carrier of lattice oxygen. The prepared catalyst and the support gamma-Al2O3 are characterized using various physicochemical techniques. XRD, Raman, and FTIR analysis show the availability of VOx and MoOx species on the alumina support. The TPR analysis gives two distinct peaks for the reduction of VOx and MoOx species, respectively. The cyclic TPR/TPO shows consistent reduction behavior of the catalyst over repeated reduction and oxidation cycles. Desorption kinetics analysis reveals low activation energy for ammonia desorption from VOx-MoOx/gamma-Al2O3 surface. This indicates a minimum interaction between VOx-MoOx and gamma-Al2O3 confirming easy availability of lattice oxygen for reaction. The ODH of ethane experiments are conducted in a fluidized CREC Riser Simulator at temperature range of 500-650 degrees C. The contact time is varied between 10 and 50s. Under the studied reaction conditions, ethylene, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and water are the major products. At fluidized condition, VOx-MoOx/gamma-Al2O3 shows significant higher ethane conversion due to the intense mixing between the catalyst and the feed. High temperature and longer contact times lead to further oxidation of the desired product ethylene to give undesired products COx. In repeated ODH of ethane and re-oxidation cycles, VOx-MoOx/gamma-Al2O3 shows stable ethane conversion and product selectivity which is consistent to the TPR/TPO evaluation results. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据