4.6 Review

Comparing Gesture Frequency Between Autistic and Neurotypical Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

期刊

PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/bul0000408

关键词

autism diagnosis; nonverbal communication; gesture production; gesture rate; gesture type

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined differences in gesture frequency between autistic and neurotypical individuals. The results showed that autistic individuals produced significantly fewer total, deictic, and emblematic gestures compared to neurotypical individuals. However, the findings regarding iconic gestures were inconclusive. Factors such as measurement methods, age, observer familiarity, and task structure influenced the effect sizes. These findings have implications for profiling gesture use in diagnostic assessments for autism and highlight gaps in our understanding of differences in gesture production in autism.
While diagnostic assessments for autism routinely screen for reduced frequency of gestures, evidence supporting reduced gesture production in autism is inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to clarify differences in frequency of gestures between autistic and neurotypical individuals. Included studies compared frequency of gestures between autistic and neurotypical individuals. Database searches (APA PsycInfo, ERIC, MEDLINE, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global) and a call for unpublished data on the International Society for Gesture Studies listserv identified research from January 1994 to March 2023. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Designs. Quantitative synthesis involved a narrative review of all findings and meta-analysis of articles allowing effect size calculations, stratified by the type of gesture. Thirty-one articles comparing frequency of gestures between 701 autistic and 860 neurotypical individuals were included in the narrative review, 25 of which were also included in the meta-analysis. Compared to neurotypical individuals, meta-analyses found that autistic individuals produced significantly less total, deictic, and emblematic gestures. While the number of iconic gestures appeared comparable between groups, studies investigating iconic gestures exhibited an almost equal trend of both positive and negative effect sizes, which were mostly nonsignificant. The way gesture production was measured, age, observer familiarity, and task structure (but not overall study quality) moderated the effect size, albeit inconsistently across the types of gestures. Findings have implications relating to profiling gesture use in diagnostic assessments for autism and highlight gaps in our understanding of differences in gesture production in autism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据