4.3 Article

Partial agonism in heteromeric GLUK2/GLUK5 kainate receptor

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.26565

关键词

agonist AMPA; conformational dynamics; heteromeric GluK2; GluK5; partial agonism; smFRET

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the mechanism of partial agonism in heteromeric GluK2/K5 receptors was investigated. It was found that the partial agonist AMPA-bound receptor occupied intermediate cleft closure conformational states at the GluK2 cleft, while in the full agonist glutamate-bound form, more open cleft conformations were observed. There was no significant difference in cleft closure states at the GluK5 agonist-binding domain between the partial agonist AMPA- and full agonist glutamate-bound states. Our findings suggest that partial agonism observed with AMPA binding is primarily mediated by differences in the GluK2 subunit.
Kainate receptors are a subtype of ionotropic glutamate receptors that form transmembrane channels upon binding glutamate. Here, we have investigated the mechanism of partial agonism in heteromeric GluK2/K5 receptors, where the GluK2 and GluK5 subunits have distinct agonist binding profiles. Using single-molecule Forster resonance energy transfer, we found that at the bi-lobed agonist-binding domain, the partial agonist AMPA-bound receptor occupied intermediate cleft closure conformational states at the GluK2 cleft, compared to the more open cleft conformations in apo form and more closed cleft conformations in the full agonist glutamate-bound form. In contrast, there is no significant difference in cleft closure states at the GluK5 agonist-binding domain between the partial agonist AMPA- and full agonist glutamate-bound states. Additionally, unlike the glutamate-bound state, the dimer interface at the agonist-binding domain is not decoupled in the AMPA-bound state. Our findings suggest that partial agonism observed with AMPA binding is mediated primarily due to differences in the GluK2 subunit, highlighting the distinct contributions of the subunits towards activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据