4.6 Article

On the regulation of human D-aspartate oxidase

期刊

PROTEIN SCIENCE
卷 32, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pro.4802

关键词

D-aspartate; flavooxidase; neurotransmission; pLG72; post-translational modification; protein-protein interaction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human flavoenzyme D-aspartate oxidase (hDASPO) plays a crucial role in controlling brain functions and its dysregulation is associated with psychiatric disorders. This study investigates the regulation of hDASPO and finds that it is nitrosylated and interacts with the protein pLG72, leading to its inactivation. Cellular experiments also show that pLG72 reduces the level of hDASPO.
The human flavoenzyme D-aspartate oxidase (hDASPO) controls the level of D-aspartate in the brain, a molecule acting as an agonist of NMDA receptors and modulator of AMPA and mGlu5 receptors. hDASPO-induced D-aspartate degradation prevents age-dependent deterioration of brain functions and is related to psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and autism. Notwithstanding this crucial role, less is known about hDASPO regulation. Here, we report that hDASPO is nitrosylated in vitro, while no evidence of sulfhydration and phosphorylation is apparent: nitrosylation affects the activity of the human flavoenzyme to a limited extent. Furthermore, hDASPO interacts with the primate-specific protein pLG72 (a well-known negative chaperone of D-amino acid oxidase, the enzyme deputed to D-serine degradation in the human brain), yielding a similar to 114 kDa complex, with a micromolar dissociation constant, promoting the flavoenzyme inactivation. At the cellular level, pLG72 and hDASPO generate a cytosolic complex: the expression of pLG72 negatively affects the hDASPO level by reducing its half-life. We propose that pLG72 binding may represent a protective mechanism aimed at avoiding cytotoxicity due to H2O2 produced by the hDASPO enzymatic degradation of D-aspartate, especially before the final targeting to peroxisomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据