4.5 Article

Prostate cancer and podcasts: an analysis and assessment of the quality of information about prostate cancer available on podcasts

期刊

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00694-y

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Podcasts are a new information source, but their quality has not been evaluated. Based on the DISCERN criteria for quality, the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for understandability and actionability, and evaluating misinformation and commercial bias, it is concluded that podcasts are currently not good information sources for lay health consumers.
Podcasts represent a new source of information for patients and families dealing with prostate cancer, but no studies have been conducted evaluating the quality of information in them. Evaluating for: (1) quality based on the validated DISCERN criteria, (2) understandability and actionability based on the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), (3) misinformation, and (4) commercial bias, we concluded that podcasts are currently not good sources of information for lay health consumers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据