4.6 Article

In-reactor behaviour and economic assessment of enriched gadolinia burnable absorbers

期刊

PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY
卷 164, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2023.104873

关键词

Burnable absorber; Gadolinium oxide; Fuel cycle; Casmo4/Simulate3; Advanced technology fuel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The increasing demand and rising prices of energy have highlighted the importance of efficiency and economic viability in operating nuclear power plants. This study evaluates the potential impacts of 157Gd-enriched Gd2O3 on nuclear power plants and suggests that by removing residual reactive isotopes, lower uranium enrichment levels can be achieved, leading to economic benefits.
The increasing demand for energy and rising energy prices have increased the importance of the efficiency and economic viability of operating nuclear power plants. One approach to improving the reactivity control in such cases is the use of burnable absorbers such as gadolinium oxide (Gd2O3). While Gd2O3 has proven effective in regulating reactivity in light water reactors, it has certain drawbacks, including the displacement of fissile isotopes from the fuel composition and residual reactivity penalties caused by isotopes other than the main neutron absorbers. In this study, the potential impacts of 157Gd-enriched Gd2O3 on the operation, safety, and economy of nuclear power plants were assessed. Fuel cycle analyses were conducted using the advanced nuclear design code system Studsvik CASMO4/SIMULATE3. Several aspects were analysed, including peaking factors, reactivity feedback parameters, power distribution, and shutdown margin. The results of the analysis revealed that by removing the isotopes responsible for residual reactivity from Gd2O3, it was possible to achieve the same fuel cycle length with lower uranium enrichment levels, enabling a higher concentration of fissile isotopes and yielding economic benefits without compromising safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据