4.7 Article

Reproductive and environmental traits explain the variation in egg size among Medusozoa (Cnidaria)

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0543

关键词

oocyte; reproduction; medusa; phylogenetic signal; depth; temperature

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Medusozoans exhibit diverse life cycles, with different semaphoronts representing the sexual phase. Our comprehensive review found that egg size, although phylogenetically conserved within medusa classes, is influenced by reproductive and environmental traits such as the number of eggs, depth, and temperature. Additionally, egg size variation among cold-water species of Staurozoa may be related to the development of small benthic larvae in this group.
Medusozoa (Cnidaria) are characterized by diverse life cycles, with different semaphoronts (medusa, medusoid, fixed gonophore, polyp) representing the sexual phase and carrying the gametes. Although egg size is often considered a proxy to understand reproductive and developmental traits of medusozoans, understanding of the processes influencing egg size variation in the group under an evolutionary context is still limited. We carried out a comprehensive review of the variation of egg size in Medusozoa to test whether this variation is related to biological/sexual or environmental traits. Egg size presents a strong phylogenetic signal (& lambda; = 0.79, K = 0.67), explaining why closely related species with different reproductive strategies and different individual sizes have similar egg sizes. However, variation in egg size is influenced by the number of eggs, depth and temperature, with larger eggs frequently present in species with few eggs (1-15), in deep-sea species and in cold-water species. Conversely, the production of small eggs among cold-water species of Staurozoa might be associated with the development of a small benthic larvae in this group. Our study reinforces that egg sizes respond to reproductive and environmental traits, although egg size is highly conserved within medusa classes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据