4.8 Article

Effect of water on seismic attenuation of the upper mantle: The origin of the sharp lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2221770120

关键词

attenuation; water; lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effect of water on the seismic properties of olivine aggregates in the oceanic lithosphere. The results show that water substantially enhances energy dispersion and reduces elastic moduli, with an attenuation peak at higher frequencies. The findings suggest that the sharp seismic changes at the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary far from mid-ocean ridges could be attributed to the difference in water content between the lithosphere and asthenosphere.
Oceanic lithosphere moves over a mechanically weak layer (asthenosphere) characterized by low seismic velocity and high attenuation. Near mid-ocean ridges, partial melting can produce such conditions because of the high-temperature geotherm. However, seis-mic observations have also shown a large and sharp velocity reduction under oceanic plates at the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (LAB) far from mid-ocean ridges. Here, we report the effect of water on the seismic properties of olivine aggregates in water-undersaturated conditions at 3 GPa and 1,223 to 1,373 K via in-situ X-ray obser-vation using cyclic loading. Our results show that water substantially enhances the energy dispersion and reduces the elastic moduli over a wide range of seismic frequencies (0.5 to 1,000 s). An attenuation peak that appears at higher frequencies (1 to 5 s) becomes more pronounced as the water content increases. If water exists only in the asthenosphere, this is consistent with the observation that the attenuation in the asthe-nosphere is almost constant over a wide frequency range. These sharp seismic changes at the oceanic LAB far from mid-ocean ridges could be explained by the difference in water content between the lithosphere and asthenosphere.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据