4.6 Article

A Kriging-based adaptive adding point strategy for structural reliability analysis

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2023.103514

关键词

Reliability analysis; Kriging model; Control sample size difference; Adaptive adding point

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an adaptive adding point strategy for structural reliability analysis in practical engineering, using a combination of Kriging surrogate model and learning function. The strategy ensures even distribution of sample points on both sides of the limit state function, preventing aggregation and redundancy, thereby improving accuracy and convergence speed. Results from system analysis demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of this method.
Aiming at the problem of structural reliability analysis with complex performance function in practical engineering, an adaptive adding point strategy for structural reliability analysis is proposed by combining Kriging surrogate model and learning function. In the process of structural reliability analysis, in order to reduce the computational cost, the surrogate model is usually used to fit the implicit performance function. Existing learning functions rarely take into account the problem of sample point aggregation due to too many sample points selected from the failure domain (or safety domain) during the fitting process. In order to overcome this defect, a new method can ensure that the added sample points are evenly distributed on both sides of the limit state function, preventing the aggregation of sample points and causing information redundancy, thereby improving the fitting accuracy of the model, accelerating the convergence speed of the sample points and saving the sample space. Through the analysis of four-branch series system, nonlinear oscillator and truss structure, the results show that the algorithm needs less samples than other methods, and the reliability calculation accuracy is higher, which verifies the correctness and efficiency of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据