4.2 Article

Production of nisin from Lactococcus lactis in acid-whey with nutrient supplementation

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10826068.2023.2249091

关键词

Acid-whey; bacteriocin; Lactococcus lactis; nisin; >

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nisin, an FDA-approved food preservative, was produced from underutilized milk industry effluent, acid-whey, by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis ATCC & REG; 11454. The addition of yeast extract (6% w/v) as nitrogen source and sucrose (4% w/v) as carbon source improved the production of Nisin. The optimized whey medium (OWM) showed better production characteristics compared to MRS media, and the addition of 0.22 mg/ml Nisin promoted its own production. Copper ions were found to be the most consumed metal ions during Nisin production in OWM. The highest yield of Nisin obtained was 2.6 x 10(5) AU/mL.
The production of Nisin, an FDA-approved food preservative, was attempted by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis ATCC & REG; 11454 using the underutilized milk industry effluent, acid-whey, as a substrate. Nisin production was further improved by studying the effect of supplementation of nutrients and non-nutritional parameters. The addition of yeast extract (6% w/v) as nitrogen source and sucrose (4% w/v) as carbon source were found to be suitable nutrients for the maximum nisin production. The changes in the medium pH due to lactic acid accumulation during batch fermentation and its influence on the production of nisin were analyzed in the optimized whey medium (OWM). The production characteristics in OWM were further compared with the nisin production in MRS media. The influence of nisin as an inducer for its own production was also studied and found that the addition of nisin at 0.22 mg/ml promote the nisin production. The analysis of consumption of various metal ions present in the OWM during the nisin production was also analyzed, and found that the copper ions are the most consumed ion. The highest nisin yield of 2.6 x 10(5) AU/mL was obtained with OWM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据