4.5 Article

Fabrication of large-area metal and semiconductor nanobridge arrays using nanotransfer printing and UV lithography

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2023.04.009

关键词

metal-Nanobridge arrays; Nanotransfer printing; UV lithography; Nanoimprint lithography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new method for fabricating large-area metal and semiconductor nanobridge arrays is proposed in this article, which combines the possibilities offered by nanotransfer printing and UV lithography. The method involves imprinting an array of nanostrips into a resist layer and subsequent UV exposure through an additional mask to define the regions where suspended nanostrip bridges will be formed. Using this method, large-area arrays of Au and Ti/Au nanobridge, as well as SiGe nanobridge arrays, were successfully fabricated. The proposed method is simple, low-cost, and can be implemented on solid and polymer substrates.
A new method for the fabrication of large-area metal and semiconductor nanobridge arrays is proposed. The method combines the possibilities offered by the nanotransfer printing technique and by UV lithography. The essence of the method consists in the formation of an array of metal or semiconductor nanostrips imprinted into a smooth layer of resist and in subsequent exposure of the resist to UV radiation through an additional mask defining the regions where the suspended nanostrip bridges will be formed during subsequent development of the resist layer. Large-area arrays of Au and Ti/Au nanobridge, 100 nm wide, 25-35 nm thick and 1-4 & mu;m long, with their ends embedded into the SU-8 resist layer, were fabricated. SiGe nanobridge arrays of 18 nm thick and 1 & mu;m long, with their ends embedded into the Shipley 1813 resist layer were fabricated. The proposed method is simple and low-cost, and it does not require using expensive reactive plasma-etching facilities and can be implemented both on solid and polymer substrates on the areas at the excess of 150 cm2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据