4.7 Article

DEM investigation on the size effect in the fragmentation of intact aggregates

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 425, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2023.118585

关键词

Particle breakage; Size effect; Diametrical compression; Discrete element method (DEM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the size effect in the fragmentation strength of cylindrical alumina aggregate under quasi-static diametrical loading is investigated using Discrete Element Method (DEM) simulations. It is found that tensile stress concentration develops in the inner margin of the damage zone, leading to the emergence and propagation of diametrical crack and catastrophic splitting of the aggregate. Both the fragmentation strength and the dimensionless damage zone size decrease to limit values, and the latter is around 0.1. The DEM simulations suggest that the formation of damage zones adjacent to the loading points induces the size effect in the fragmentation of intact aggregate.
In this work, the size effect in the fragmentation strength of cylindrical alumina aggregate under quasi-static diametrical loading is investigated by performing Discrete Element Method (DEM) simulations. It is found that tensile stress concentration develops in the inner margin of the damage zone, ultimately leading to the emergence and propagation of diametrical crack and thus the catastrophic splitting of the compressed aggregate. Both the fragmentation strength and the dimensionless damage zone size (normalized by aggregate diameter) decrease to limit values, and the latter is around 0.1. It is found that the obtained limit value of fragmentation strength is approximately equal to the tensile fracture strength of the corresponding rectangular sample having two equal-length side cracks with length being 0.1 times the sample width. The DEM simulations thus suggest that the formation of damage zones adjacent to the loading points would induce the size effect in the frag-mentation of intact aggregate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据