4.7 Article

Research on the particle circulation flow and classification performance of multi-stage cylindrical hydrocyclones

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 429, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2023.118908

关键词

Cylindrical hydrocyclone; Multi-stage cylindrical hydrocyclone; Particle circulation flow; Classification efficiency; Particle misplacement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The particle circulation flow and classification performance of the cylindrical hydrocyclone and multi-stage cylindrical hydrocyclone were studied using numerical simulations and physical tests. The results showed that the multi-stage cylindrical hydrocyclone can enhance the circulation flow of certain particles and limit the circulation flow of others, leading to improved classification efficiency.
The cylindrical hydrocyclone is widely used for coarse particle classification to suppress the misplaced fine particles in the underflow. Nevertheless, the unique flat bottom structure generates particle circulation flow, causing the misplacement of coarse particles in the overflow. A multi-stage cylindrical hydrocyclone is designed to regulate the particle circulation flow by shortening the particle radial settling distance. The particle circulation flow and classification performance of the cylindrical hydrocyclone and multi-stage cylindrical hydrocyclone are investigated by numerical simulations and physical tests. The numerical test results demonstrate that the multistage cylindrical hydrocyclone strengthens the circulation flow of 59.5 pm particles and 89 pm particles, and limits the circulation flow of 150 pm particles, increasing the enrichment ratio of 59.5 pm particles and 89 pm particles, reducing the enrichment ratio of 150 pm particles. The experimental results indicate that the multi stage cylindrical hydrocyclone suppresses particle misplacement in the overflow and underflow with superior classification efficiency, sharper separation accuracy, smaller cut size, and higher solids yields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据