4.6 Review

Structure-Bioactivity Relationships of Methylxanthines: Trying to Make Sense of All the Promises and the Drawbacks

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 21, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules21080974

关键词

caffeine; cancer; diabetes; methylxanthine; neurodegenerative diseases; structure-activity relationship; theobromine; theophylline

资金

  1. Portuguese Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia-FCT [SFRH/BPD/80451/2011, SFRH/BPD/108837/2015]
  2. CICS-UBI [PestC/SAU/UI0709/2014]
  3. UMIB [Pest-OE/SAU/UI0215/2014]
  4. FEDER via Programa Operacional Fatores de Competitividade-COMPETE/QREN FSE
  5. POPH funds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methylxanthines are a group of phytochemicals derived from the purine base xanthine and obtained from plant secondary metabolism. They are unobtrusively included in daily diet in common products as coffee, tea, energetic drinks, or chocolate. Caffeine is by far the most studied methylxanthine either in animal or epidemiologic studies. Theophylline and theobromine are other relevant methylxanthines also commonly available in the aforementioned sources. There are many disseminated myths about methylxanthines but there is increased scientific knowledge to discuss all the controversy and promise shown by these intriguing phytochemicals. In fact, many beneficial physiologic outcomes have been suggested for methylxanthines in areas as important and diverse as neurodegenerative and respiratory diseases, diabetes or cancer. However, there have always been toxicity concerns with methylxanthine (over) consumption and pharmacologic applications. Herein, we explore the structure-bioactivity relationships to bring light those enumerated effects. The potential shown by methylxanthines in such a wide range of conditions should substantiate many other scientific endeavors that may highlight their adequacy as adjuvant therapy agents and may contribute to the advent of functional foods. Newly designed targeted molecules based on methylxanthine structure may originate more specific and effective outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据