4.7 Article

A biobased epoxy vitrimer/cellulose composite for 3D printing by Liquid Deposition Modelling

期刊

POLYMER TESTING
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.108172

关键词

Vitrimer; Biobased composites; Additive manufacturing; Cellulose; Liquid deposition modeling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a vitrimeric material based on epoxy-functionalised cardanol cured with a biobased polycarboxylic acid was prepared. The material showed reprocessability without significant change in properties after a second curing cycle. It was then used in combination with cellulose powder to prepare a sustainable and biobased composite, suitable for 3D printing.
Conventional epoxy polymers are obtained from oil-based resources and their structure is formed by permanent covalent crosslinks. Therefore, this class of materials is now considered non environmentally friendly as they are neither renewable nor reprocessable and recyclable. In this study, we prepared a vitrimeric material based on an epoxy-functionalised cardanol cured with a biobased polycarboxylic acid. In the presence of a zinc-containing catalyst, a soft polyester with a Tg = -13 degrees C was obtained; its reprocessability by a chemical method was demonstrated to be feasible without any relevant change in properties once a second curing cycle was completed. The vitrimeric polyester was then used in combination with cellulose powder for the preparation of a sustainable and biobased composite. The matrix/filler mass fraction was tailored to obtain a composite paste with suitable rheological properties for 3D printing via Liquid Deposition Modelling (LDM). Preliminary printing tests were successful, and the vitrimeric printed parts were then thermally cured retaining the shape. The suitability of the vitrimeric composite for additive manufacturing was thus confirmed: the new material can provide a solution to 3D printing of recyclable thermosetting biobased polymers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据