4.7 Article

Synchrotron radiation X-ray laminography of internal damage in short-fiber-reinforced polyamide 6 under cyclic tensile loading

期刊

POLYMER TESTING
卷 128, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.108242

关键词

CFRP; Injection molding; Fatigue damage; Computed tomography imaging; Laminography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, non-destructive throughthickness measurements were conducted to investigate the internal fatigue damage behavior in fiber-reinforced plastics. It was found that under fatigue loading, voids and delaminations were nucleated near the notch tip, and the damaged zone extended with incremental fatigue cycles. Furthermore, the damage zone was larger near the surfaces in plane-stress condition than inside the specimen in plane-strain condition.
Fiber-reinforced plastics are lightweight materials expected to reduce greenhouse gases and the fatigue properties need to be clarified to extend the practical applications. However, the fatigue tests have been limited to the surface or cross-sectional observation of cut specimens. In this study, we conducted non-destructive throughthickness measurements using synchrotron radiation X-ray laminography to investigate the internal fatigue damage behavior in sharply notched carbon fiber (30 wt%)-reinforced polyamide 6 specimens. Under fatigue loading, a large number of voids in the matrix and delaminations at the carbon fiber sides as well as fiber ends were nucleated near the notch tip. Incremental fatigue cycles caused voids coalescence, resulting in the extension of the damaged zone. The unit volume of voids increased locally in severely damaged zone due to coalescence of the voids, while it decreased in adjacent locations because the residual voids were small, which resulted in the larger diversity of unit volume of voids. In the specimen thickness direction, the damage zone was larger near the surfaces in plane-stress condition than inside the specimen in plane-strain condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据