4.7 Article

Nanocomposites for gas barrier applications: Governing factors, single and coupled effects, new routes to optimise the function properties

期刊

POLYMER TESTING
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.108124

关键词

Nanocomposites; Morphology; Interphase; Filler dispersion state; Gas barrier properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objectives of this feature paper are to analyze the gas barrier properties of nanocomposites made from different nanofiller types and synthesis routes based on our work results. It will provide an overview of the governing parameters and demonstrate how they can be adapted or combined to optimize functional properties. The paper will also highlight the benefits of using modelling approaches in combination with experimental studies to better understand transport mechanisms and determine suitable morphologies for specific functional property levels. The importance of utilizing gas transport as a tool to probe materials, particularly interphases, will be emphasized. Finally, new development routes under investigation will be presented.
The objectives of this feature paper are to analyse, from our work results, gas barrier properties of nanocomposites made from different nanofiller types and synthesis routes. An overview of the governing parameters will be made and it will be shown how these different parameters can be adapted or combined to optimise these functional properties. It will also be demonstrated the interest of modelling approaches (going from analytical to numerical 3D finite element modelling) when used in complementarity with experimental studies for a better understanding of the transport mechanisms involved as for the determination of the most suitable morphologies for a given function property level. The interest of exploiting gas transport as a tool to probe the materials, especially the interphases, will also be highlighted. Finally new development routes under investigation will be given.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据