4.7 Article

Non-linear thermoelastic vibration and optimum frequency prediction of sandwich composite corrugated panels with honeycomb auxetic core

期刊

POLYMER COMPOSITES
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pc.27799

关键词

auxetic honeycomb core; graphene-reinforced composites; Halpin-Tsai micromechanics; non-linear vibration; optimization; sinusoidally-corrugation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article examines the non-linear free vibration behavior of sandwich composite panels with sinusoidal corrugations. By modeling and optimizing various parameters, the non-linear frequencies under different conditions are obtained.
In this article, the non-linear free vibration behavior of sandwich composite panels with sinusoidal corrugations is examined. These panels consist of a top and bottom skin made of a graphene-reinforced composite, with an auxetic honeycomb core having negative Poisson's ratio. The non-linear kinematic field is based on Kant's higher-order shear-deformation theory and the Green-strain, which incorporates all the higher-order terms. By implementing the Hamilton principle, the non-linear governing equations are affirmed and solved further through 2D-isoparametric finite element approximations via Lagrangian elements in conjunction with Picard's successive iterative scheme. The comparison and validation tests demonstrate the correctness of the present model. The established sandwich model is further employed for various parametric conditions by varying the core-to-face sheet thickness, auxetic honeycomb properties, graphene volume fraction, shell configurations, temperature, and support conditions. These numerous results exemplify the non-linear frequencies at small-to-large amplitudes for the sandwich shell structures and are discussed in detail. In addition, a multi-objective parametric optimization is conducted using the response surface method to investigate the optimal values of the corrugated auxetic honeycomb shell panel's parameters, resulting maximum frequency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据