4.3 Article

Click Chemistry-Based Synthesis, Characterization, and DFT Studies of Some Novel 2-Acetylphenoxy-1,2,3-Triazoles

期刊

POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC COMPOUNDS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10406638.2023.2259567

关键词

2-Hydroxyacetophenone; click chemistry; 1,2,3-Triazole; CuAAC; DFT calculation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of new 1,2,3-triazole-acetophenone hybrid systems were synthesized through a click reaction and characterized. It was found that compound 9 exhibited higher chemical reactivity compared to the other compounds, while compounds 8, 10, 11, 12, and 13 showed the highest stability and the lowest reactivity.
A series of the new 1,2,3-triazole-acetophenone hybrid system are synthesized from the click reaction between 1-(2-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)phenyl)ethan-1-one 1 and different azido benzene derivatives 2-7. All compounds are characterized by H-1 NMR, C-13 NMR, mass spectra, and elemental analyses. Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM) detected highly ordered aggregations, and the morphology of the compounds was determined, directed by van der Waals (vdW) forces and p-p stacking interactions. The Gaussian 09 and Gaussian view 6.0 softwares are used for all Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations at the B3LYP. Band gap, molecular softness, electronegativity, and electrophilicity measurements show that molecule 9 is a soft molecule with higher polarizability, lower kinetic stability, and more chemical reactivity than the other molecules, which tend to be the most stable and least reactive. The molecules can be divided into two categories based on their chemical potential values: Although compound 9 looks to have more activity, compounds 8, 10, 11, 12, and 13 often have the best stability and least reactivity. According to the MEPs, the nitrogen and oxygen atoms are the electronegative potential sites in all compounds, while the hydrogen atoms in the alkyl and aromatic cyclic groups are the electropositive potential sites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据