4.6 Article

Honey gold nanoparticles attenuate the secretion of IL-6 by LPS-activated macrophages

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 18, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291076

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a cytokine that regulates host immune responses. Excessive IL-6 can lead to chronic inflammatory diseases. Researchers have found that gold nanoparticles synthesized with honey can reduce the secretion of IL-6 by LPS-activated macrophages, possibly by modulating the TLR4/NF-kappa B signaling pathway. Further studies may provide new therapeutic approaches for chronic inflammation.
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a pleiotropic cytokine that coordinates host immune responses to infection. Though essential to the acute phase response, prolonged IL-6-mediated recruitment of mononuclear cells has been implicated in chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and Crohn's disease. Accordingly, identifying novel therapeutics that diminish circulating IL-6 levels could benefit individuals suffering from chronic inflammation. In immunocompetent hosts, bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) recognition by toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) activates the transcription factor NF-kappa B, driving macrophage production of IL-6. Interestingly, both citrate-stabilized and 'green' synthesized gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have been shown to modulate the cytokine responses of LPS-activated macrophages. Here we demonstrate that AuNPs, synthesized with commercial and locally sourced honey, downregulate LPS-induced macrophage secretion of IL-6. Compared to LPS-only controls, inhibition of IL-6 levels was observed for all three types of honey AuNPs. The effect was likely driven by honey AuNP-mediated perturbation of the TLR4/NF-kappa B signaling pathway, as evidenced by a reduction in the phosphorylation of I kappa B. Further investigation into the anti-inflammatory properties of honey AuNPs may yield novel therapeutics for the treatment of chronic inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据