☆ 4.6 Article

Social acceptance of genetic engineering technology

PLOS ONE (2023)

相关参考文献

注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。

Review Biochemical Research Methods

Towards progressive regulatory approaches for agricultural applications of animal biotechnology

Eric M. Hallerman et al.

Summary: Traditional breeding techniques have greatly benefited agricultural animals, but genome editing techniques now offer new opportunities for targeted genetic alterations. Regulatory approaches are being defined, and an international community is actively discussing and sharing information on animal biotechnology.

TRANSGENIC RESEARCH (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Article Agriculture, Multidisciplinary

Citizen views on genome editing: effects of species and purpose

Gesa Busch et al.

Summary: The study analyzes public response to five different applications of genome editing in various countries, revealing differences in attitudes and perceptions. Participants generally viewed disease resistance in humans as most acceptable, while changes in cattle product quality and quantity were seen as least acceptable. This research contributes to understanding public response to genome editing applications.

AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Article Agriculture, Multidisciplinary

Genome-edited versus genetically-modified tomatoes: an experiment on people's perceptions and acceptance of food biotechnology in the UK and Switzerland

Angela Bearth et al.

Summary: The study investigates people's perceptions and acceptance of food biotechnology, suggesting higher acceptance for genome editing compared to transgenic genetic modification. Acceptance depends on the perceived benefits, uncertainty, and country of residence.

AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Public perceptions of potential adaptations for mitigating heat stress on Australian dairy farms

Jillian Hendricks et al.

Summary: Participants in the study were divided into four treatments representing potential solutions to mitigate heat stress in dairy cattle, with results suggesting that the Australian public may be reluctant to accept heat stress mitigation strategies that either do not allow cows access to pasture or include gene-editing technologies.

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Article Nutrition & Dietetics

Gene-Edited Meat: Disentangling Consumers' Attitudes and Potential Purchase Behavior

Daniel Martin-Collado et al.

Summary: This study investigated public attitudes and consumption predisposition towards gene-edited meat products and their potential added benefits to livestock farming. The results show that gene-editing technology is perceived as an extrinsic cue of meat products quality and can generate controversy and opposition. However, added benefits increase the consumption predisposition of most consumers who are moderate or pro-gene editing, with animal welfare-related benefits having a greater effect.

FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Review Agriculture, Multidisciplinary

Advancing genome editing to improve the sustainability and resiliency of animal agriculture

Diane Wray-Cahen et al.

Summary: Animal agriculture faces various challenges, and genome editing has the potential to address them by increasing productivity, improving animal welfare, adapting to climate change, and reducing environmental impact. However, global regulatory and policy support is crucial for the implementation of genome editing in agriculture.

CABI AGRICULTURE & BIOSCIENCE (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Review Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Trust and Risk Perception: A Critical Review of the Literature

Michael Siegrist

Summary: The importance of trust in risk perception and acceptance varies by hazard and respondent group. Most studies use surveys that provide limited information. Future research should focus more on experiments testing whether trust is a result of people's attitudes.

RISK ANALYSIS (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Ethics

Experts' moral views on gene drive technologies: a qualitative interview study

N. de Graeff et al.

Summary: The study interviewed 33 GDT experts from different disciplines to better understand their moral views on these technologies. The experts' moral views were mainly influenced by their attitudes towards the uncertainty related to GDTs, the alternatives they should be compared to, and the role humans should have in nature. The insights obtained from the study provide valuable stepping-stones for a constructive debate and further reflection on underlying value conflicts.

BMC MEDICAL ETHICS (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Agricultural Economics & Policy

Is Animal Welfare Promoting Hornless Cattle? Assessing Consumer's Valuation for Milk from Gene-edited Cows under Different Information Regimes

Valerie Kilders et al.

Summary: Gene-editing technology is rapidly becoming a predominant genetic-engineering breeding technique due to its ability to achieve genetic engineering goals without transgene modifications. Consumers' perception of gene-edited food products and their response to information about its benefits remain unclear, with information strongly influencing consumer preferences.

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Green & Sustainable Science & Technology

Gene Editing for Improved Animal Welfare and Production Traits in Cattle: Will This Technology Be Embraced or Rejected by the Public?

Maria Cristina Yunes et al.

Summary: Acceptance of gene editing is low and depends heavily on the application proposed, with support declining when it is perceived to harm animal welfare, be profit driven, or reinforce intensive livestock systems. Uneven distribution of risks and benefits among consumers, corporations, farmers, and animals also reduces acceptability. Interviewees do not view gene editing as a natural process due to high human interference and acceleration of natural processes.

SUSTAINABILITY (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology

Public Perceptions Regarding Genomic Technologies Applied to Breeding Farm Animals: A Qualitative Study

Francis Z. Z. Naab et al.

Summary: The societal acceptability determines the commercialization of genomic technologies in animal production systems. Public priorities and attitudes should be considered in technological implementation, commercialization trajectories, regulation, and policy development. More effective co-production practices are needed to align genomic technologies with public priorities and ensure their acceptance in society.

BIOTECH (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Agriculture, Multidisciplinary

Effects of information on consumer attitudes towards gene-edited foods: a comparison between livestock and vegetables

Naoko Kato-Nitta et al.

Summary: The study found that people have a more positive attitude towards gene-edited vegetables than gene-edited livestock. Respondents who were provided with information using tomato illustrations were less accepting of gene-edited livestock compared to those provided with pig illustrations. Higher science literacy was associated with more positive attitudes towards improvements in vegetable breeding, but not in livestock breeding.

CABI AGRICULTURE & BIOSCIENCE (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Review Food Science & Technology

Consumer acceptance of novel food technologies

Michael Siegrist et al.

NATURE FOOD (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Article Communication

Science, God, and Nature: A Textual and Frequency Analysis of Facebook Comments on News Articles About Agricultural and Environmental Gene Editing

Brittany Walker et al.

ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Breaking the impasse: Towards a forward-looking governance framework for gene editing with plants

Phil Macnaghten et al.

PLANTS PEOPLE PLANET (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Article Communication

Of Society, Nature, and Health: How Perceptions of Specific Risks and Benefits of Genetically Engineered Foods Shape Public Rejection

Kathleen M. Rose et al.

ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Review Biology

The ethics of genome editing in non-human animals: a systematic review of reasons reported in the academic literature

Nienke de Graeff et al.

PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Agriculture, Multidisciplinary

Genome Editing and Responsible Innovation, Can They Be Reconciled?

Ann Bruce et al.

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Public attitudes towards genetically modified polled cattle

Emilie McConnachie et al.

PLOS ONE (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Biochemical Research Methods

Canadian regulatory aspects of gene editing technologies

Kenneth W. Ellens et al.

TRANSGENIC RESEARCH (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Biochemical Research Methods

Application of genome editing in farm animals: cattle

Alison L. Van Eenennaam

TRANSGENIC RESEARCH (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Ethics

The ethical landscape of gene drive research

Daniel Edward Callies

BIOETHICS (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Does the U.S. public support using gene drives in agriculture? And what do they want to know?

Michael S. Jones et al.

SCIENCE ADVANCES (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Public attitudes toward genetic modification in dairy cattle

Caroline Ritter et al.

PLOS ONE (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Communication

The elephant in the room: How a technology's name affects its interpretation

Reginald Boersma et al.

PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary

Genetic engineering, genetic modification, or agricultural biotechnology: does the term matter?

Nagwan R. Zahry et al.

JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Political Science

Rethinking political distrust

Eri Bertsou

EUROPEAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Review Nutrition & Dietetics

An Overview of Attitudes Toward Genetically Engineered Food

Sydney E. Scott et al.

ANNUAL REVIEW OF NUTRITION, VOL 38 (2018)

添加到收藏夹

Article Agricultural Economics & Policy

Do consumers care how a genetically engineered food was created or who created it?

Jayson L. Lusk et al.

FOOD POLICY (2018)

添加到收藏夹

Article Agriculture, Multidisciplinary

Is CRISPR an Ethical Game Changer?

Marcus Schultz-Bergin

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS (2018)

添加到收藏夹

Article Food Science & Technology

CRISPR versus GMOs: Public acceptance and valuation

Aaron M. Shew et al.

GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT (2018)

添加到收藏夹

Review Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology

Livestock 2.0-genome editing for fitter, healthier, and more productive farmed animals

Christine Tait-Burkard et al.

GENOME BIOLOGY (2018)

添加到收藏夹

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

When is genetic modification socially acceptable? When used to advance human health through avenues other than food

Nicole J. Olynk Widmar et al.

PLOS ONE (2017)

添加到收藏夹

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

CRISPR is knocking on barn door

I. Lamas-Toranzo et al.

REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS (2017)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Biology

Point of view: How should the applications of genome editing be assessed and regulated?

Robin Fears et al.

ELIFE (2017)

添加到收藏夹

Review Agronomy

Cisgenesis and genome editing: combining concepts and efforts for a smarter use of genetic resources in crop breeding

Teodoro Cardi

PLANT BREEDING (2016)

添加到收藏夹

Review Food Science & Technology

Are risk or benefit perceptions more important for public acceptance of innovative food technologies: A meta-analysis

Angela Bearth et al.

TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY (2016)

添加到收藏夹

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops

Wilhelm Kluemper et al.

PLOS ONE (2014)

添加到收藏夹

Review Food Science & Technology

Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification - A systematic review and meta-analysis

Lynn J. Frewer et al.

TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY (2013)

添加到收藏夹

Article Economics

Understanding social acceptance of electricity generation sources

Nicolas C. Bronfman et al.

ENERGY POLICY (2012)

添加到收藏夹

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity

Martin Jinek et al.

SCIENCE (2012)

添加到收藏夹

Review Communication

Socio-psychological determinants of public acceptance of technologies: A review

Nidhi Gupta et al.

PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE (2012)

添加到收藏夹

Review Food Science & Technology

Consumer response to novel agri-food technologies: Implications for predicting consumer acceptance of emerging food technologies

L. J. Frewer et al.

TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY (2011)

添加到收藏夹

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?

Michael Buhrmester et al.

PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2011)

添加到收藏夹

Article Communication

Genetically modified food in the news: media representations of the GM debate in the UK

Martha Augoustinos et al.

PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE (2010)

添加到收藏夹

Article Psychology, Social

Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power

Daniel M. Oppenheimer et al.

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2009)

添加到收藏夹

Article Communication

Perceptions, Knowledge and ethical concerns with GM foods and the GM process

Andrew J. Knight

PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE (2009)

添加到收藏夹

Article Agricultural Economics & Policy

Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy

Montserrat Costa-Font et al.

FOOD POLICY (2008)

添加到收藏夹

Article Psychology, Social

Biotechnology in the Japanese media: Comparative analysis of newspaper articles on genetic engineering in Japan and Europe

A Hibino et al.

ASIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2006)

添加到收藏夹

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Trust in risk regulation: Cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food?

W Poortinga et al.

RISK ANALYSIS (2005)

添加到收藏夹

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Major psychological factors affecting acceptance of gene-recombination technology

Y Tanaka

RISK ANALYSIS (2004)

添加到收藏夹

Article Sociology

Animals in their nature: A case study on public attitudes to animals, genetic modification and 'nature'

P Macnaghten

SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION (2004)

添加到收藏夹

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology

M Siegrist

RISK ANALYSIS (2000)

添加到收藏夹

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.