4.8 Article

Kinetic modeling identifies targets for engineering improved photosynthetic efficiency in potato (Solanum tuberosum cv. Solara)

期刊

PLANT JOURNAL
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.16512

关键词

metabolic modeling; kinetic modeling; photosynthetic efficiency; Solanum tuberosum; crop productivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Potato is an important non-grain food crop, and increasing its yield potential can be achieved by addressing bottlenecks in photosynthetic metabolism. Through simulating and optimizing resource investment, it was found that increasing the amounts of three enzymes - Rubisco, FBP aldolase, and SBPase - can enhance the photosynthetic rate of potato.
Potato (Solanum tuberosum) is a significant non-grain food crop in terms of global production. However, its yield potential might be raised by identifying means to release bottlenecks within photosynthetic metabolism, from the capture of solar energy to the synthesis of carbohydrates. Recently, engineered increases in photosynthetic rates in other crops have been directly related to increased yield - how might such increases be achieved in potato? To answer this question, we derived the photosynthetic parameters V-cmax and J(max) to calibrate a kinetic model of leaf metabolism (e-Photosynthesis) for potato. This model was then used to simulate the impact of manipulating the expression of genes and their protein products on carbon assimilation rates in silico through optimizing resource investment among 23 photosynthetic enzymes, predicting increases in photosynthetic CO2 uptake of up to 67%. However, this number of manipulations would not be practical with current technologies. Given a limited practical number of manipulations, the optimization indicated that an increase in amounts of three enzymes - Rubisco, FBP aldolase, and SBPase - would increase net assimilation. Increasing these alone to the levels predicted necessary for optimization increased photosynthetic rate by 28% in potato.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据