4.7 Article

E3 ubiquitin ligases SINA4 and SINA11 regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis by targeting the IAA29-ARF5-1-ERF3 module in apple

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.14709

关键词

ARF; AUX/IAA; auxin; ubiquitination modification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identifies the negative regulator MdARF5-1 in apple as a component of the auxin signaling pathway that inhibits anthocyanin biosynthesis by suppressing the expression of the ethylene response factor MdERF3. The auxin repressor MdIAA29 attenuates the inhibitory effect of MdARF5-1 on anthocyanin biosynthesis by alleviating the transcriptional inhibition of MdERF3. Furthermore, the E3 ubiquitin ligases MdSINA4 and MdSINA11 regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis by targeting MdIAA29 and MdARF5-1 for ubiquitination degradation, respectively.
Auxin/indole-3-acetic acid (AUX/IAA) and auxin response factor (ARF) proteins are important components of the auxin signalling pathway, but their ubiquitination modification and the mechanism of auxin-mediated anthocyanin biosynthesis remain elusive. Here, the ARF MdARF5-1 was identified as a negative regulator of anthocyanin biosynthesis in apple, and it integrates auxin and ethylene signals by inhibiting the expression of the ethylene response factor MdERF3. The auxin repressor MdIAA29 decreased the inhibitory effect of MdARF5-1 on anthocyanin biosynthesis by attenuating the transcriptional inhibition of MdERF3 by MdARF5-1. In addition, the E3 ubiquitin ligases MdSINA4 and MdSINA11 played negative and positive regulatory roles in anthocyanin biosynthesis by targeting MdIAA29 and MdARF5-1 for ubiquitination degradation, respectively. MdSINA4 destabilized MdSINA11 to regulate anthocyanin accumulation in response to auxin signalling. In sum, our data revealed the crosstalk between auxin and ethylene signals mediated by the IAA29-ARF5-1-ERF3 module and provide new insights into the ubiquitination modification of the auxin signalling pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据