4.7 Article

Understanding the anaerobic BTEX removal in continuous-flow bioreactors for ex situ bioremediation purposes

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 281, 期 -, 页码 272-280

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.06.106

关键词

BTEX; Anaerobic treatment; Contaminated water; Microbial community structure; UASB

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - CNPq [481270/2010-8]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - CAPES [PNPD 3022/2010]
  3. Fundacao Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - Funcap [078.01.00/09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work aimed to understand the anaerobic BTEX removal in continuous-flow bioreactors for ex situ bioremediation purposes, evaluating the effect of some operational parameters on efficiency, stability and microbial community structure. The influence of the hydraulic retention time, effluent recirculation and co-substrate (ethanol) concentration was investigated on a mesophilic UASB bioreactor operated under methanogenic conditions. The changes on the bacterial and archaeal communities were evaluated in terms of diversity, evenness and richness. Good BTEX removal (similar to 63%) and reactor stability could still be reached at a HRT of 24 h. The impact of the effluent recirculation on BTEX removal was not evident at high co-substrate (ethanol) concentrations, but it was significant when low concentrations were applied. The reduction of ethanol concentration had a positive impact on BTEX removal (from 80% to 86%), especially for benzene (from 51% to 62%). The optimal degree of evenness likely contributed to the relatively high stability of the system in terms of BTEX removal. Changes observed in bacterial and archaeal richness did not match with the functioning of the system. However, dynamics and evenness parameters seemed to be of importance in maintaining a stable reactor performance. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据