4.6 Article

Effect of Selected Plant Phenolics on Fe2+-EDTA-H2O2 System Mediated Deoxyribose Oxidation: Molecular Structure-Derived Relationships of Anti- and Pro-Oxidant Actions

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules22010059

关键词

hydroxyl radicals; polyphenols; plant phenolic acids; Fenton system

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund through the Polish Innovative Economy Operational Program [UDAPOIG 01.03.01-10-109/08-00]
  2. Medical University of Lodz [503/1-079-01/503-11-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the presence of transition metal ions and peroxides, polyphenols, well-known dietary antioxidants, can act as pro-oxidants. We investigated the effect of 13 polyphenols and their metabolites on oxidative degradation of deoxyribose by an (OH)-O-center dot generating Fenton system (Fe2+-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-H2O2). The relationship between phenolics pro-oxidant/anti-oxidant effects and their molecular structure was analyzed using multivariate analysis with multiple linear regression and a backward stepwise technique. Four phenolics revealed a significant inhibitory effect on OH-induced deoxyribose degradation, ranging from 54.4% +/- 28.6% (3,4-dihydroxycinnamic acid) to 38.5% +/- 10.4% (catechin) (n = 6), correlating with the number of -OH substitutions (r = 0.58). Seven phenolics augmented the oxidative degradation of deoxyribose with the highest enhancement at 95.0% +/- 21.3% (quercetin) and 60.6% +/- 12.2% (phloridzin). The pro-oxidant effect correlated (p < 0.05) with the number of -OH groups (r = 0.59), and aliphatic substitutes (r = -0.22) and weakly correlated with the occurrence of a catechol structure within the compound molecule (r = 0.17). Selective dietary supplementation with phenolics exhibiting pro-oxidant activity may increase the possibility of systemic oxidative stress in patients treated with medications containing chelating properties or those with high plasma concentrations of H2O2 and non-transferrin bound iron.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据