4.7 Article

Low baseline intraspecific variation in leaf pressure-volume traits: Biophysical basis and implications for spectroscopic sensing

期刊

PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM
卷 175, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ppl.13974

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intra-specific trait variation (ITV) is important in various processes, but it is rarely quantified for ecophysiological traits such as PV curve parameters. This study found low ITV for PV parameters compared to other morphological traits and strong intraspecific relationships among PV traits, using a conservative sampling design.
Intra-specific trait variation (ITV) plays a role in processes at a wide range of scales from organs to ecosystems across climate gradients. Yet, ITV remains rarely quantified for many ecophysiological traits typically assessed for species means, such as pressure volume (PV) curve parameters including osmotic potential at full turgor and modulus of elasticity, which are important in plant water relations. We defined a baseline reference ITV (ITVref) as the variation among fully exposed, mature sun leaves of replicate individuals of a given species grown in similar, well-watered conditions, representing the conservative sampling design commonly used for species-level ecophysiological traits. We hypothesized that PV parameters would show low ITVref relative to other leaf morphological traits, and that their intraspecific relationships would be similar to those previously established across species and proposed to arise from biophysical constraints. In a database of novel and published PV curves and additional leaf structural traits for 50 diverse species, we found low ITVref for PV parameters relative to other morphological traits, and strong intraspecific relationships among PV traits. Simulation modeling showed that conservative ITVref enables the use of species-mean PV parameters for scaling up from spectroscopic measurements of leaf water content to enable sensing of leaf water potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据