4.7 Article

Experimental investigation on the nodal-shaped oscillation in vortex-induced vibration of a rectangular cylinder

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 35, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0163347

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a peculiar nodal-shaped oscillation in vortex-induced vibration (VIV), which is characterized by a cycle of divergence and decay. Wind tunnel tests and flow analysis reveal that the dynamics of this oscillation are governed by the coupling and competition between the wake mode and the structure mode.
This paper presents a peculiar nodal-shaped oscillation in vortex-induced vibration (VIV). This response is distinct from the commonly observed limit cycle oscillation in VIV and other aeroelastic problems. To gain insight into the dynamics in nodal-shaped oscillation, we conduct wind tunnel tests to investigate the VIV response of a freely oscillating rectangular cylinder with various transverse structural natural frequencies fs and wind speeds. The evolution of the flow field during nodal-shaped oscillation was examined using time-frequency analysis and modal analysis. During the divergent stage of the nodal-shaped oscillation, two modes, namely, the wake mode with a frequency of f = 1.28f(s) and the structure mode with a frequency of f = f(s), were found to dominate the response of the flow. The two modes in VIV are coupled and compete with each other, diverging the oscillation of the structure. As the oscillation diverges and the amplitude increases to the maximum, the wake mode vanishes, which disengages the coupling of the fluid and structure modes. This stops the VIV and the oscillation decays until the wake mode reappears at f = 1.28f(s). The above processes cycle over and over again, resulting in nodal-shaped (divergent-decay-divergent-decay) oscillation cycles. This finding explains the underlying dynamical mechanism of nodal-shaped oscillation and demonstrates the strong relationship between the wake mode and VIV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据