4.7 Article

Compressibility effects on the flow past a T106A low-pressure turbine cascade

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 35, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0172334

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present numerical investigation explores the relationship between Mach number, flow characteristics, and vorticity dynamics in a T106A low-pressure turbine blade passage. The results show that as the Mach number increases, the separation phenomenon is delayed, but there is an overall increase in blade profile loss and a decrease in turbulent mixing, which negatively affects LPT performance.
The present numerical investigation delves into the intricate interplay between Mach number (M-s), flow characteristics, and vorticity dynamics within a T106A low-pressure turbine (LPT) blade passage. The two-dimensional (2D) compressible Navier-Stokes equations are solved using a high-accuracy, dispersion relation preserving methodology, which is validated against benchmark direct numerical simulations. Four M-s ranging from 0.15 to 0.30 are computed in order to display the intricate response of compressibility on the separation-induced transition process. The emergence and evolution of unsteady separation bubbles along the suction surface of the T106A blade are explored, revealing a growing trend with M-s. The time-averaged boundary layer parameters evaluated along the suction surface display a delayed separation with a smaller streamwise extent with increasing M-s. However, an overall increase in the blade profile loss and a decrease in turbulent mixing are observed with increasing M-s, suggesting a detrimental effect on LPT performance. Applying the compressible enstrophy transport equation (CETE) to the flow in a T106A blade passage reveals that while a linear relationship exists between M-s and certain CETE budget terms, other terms have a nuanced dependency, which paves the way for future investigations into the role of compressibility on enstrophy dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据