4.7 Article

Aeroacoustic investigation of transonic flow behavior in M219 deep cavity with passive flow control configurations

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 35, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0163526

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the impact of front and aft wall modifications on the sound pressure level response of the M219 cavity at transonic speed. The results show that modifications to the aft wall are more effective in reducing noise than modifications to the front wall. Mixed configurations of the most effective wall modifications further reduce the frequency and amplitude of pressure oscillations.
This study aims to investigate the effect of front and aft wall modifications and their combinations on the sound pressure level response of the deep configuration of the M219 cavity at transonic speed. Experimental results for the baseline geometry of the cavity were validated with the high-fidelity lattice Boltzmann method computational fluid dynamics solver, SIMULIA PowerFLOW (R). In this study, inclined and parallel cuts were applied to the front and aft walls of the M219 cavity to determine their efficiency in reducing the overall sound pressure level (OASPL). The most effective configurations on reducing OASPL at the front and aft walls were combined to form mixed configurations. All front wall and aft wall configurations as well as mixed configurations were validated through grid independence studies. Simulations showed that modifications to the aft wall were more effective in reducing noise than modifications to the front wall. The spectral analysis of pressure oscillations provided information about the broadband and tonal pressure responses of the mixed configurations. The findings showed that the mixed configurations were effective in reducing the frequency and amplitude of the Rossiter modes. The most successful configurations on noise reduction also showed a decrease in the drag coefficient and the average static pressure distribution along the cavity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据