4.7 Article

Impact dynamics of a viscous drop containing a particle

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 35, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0079983

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12072258, 11850410439, 11702210, B18040]
  2. Cyrus Tang Foundation through the Tang Scholar program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the impact dynamics of a solid-liquid compound drop on a solid surface was investigated experimentally. It was found that the separation threshold between the particle and the drop varies with the viscosity of the liquid, and the shifting of the particle before impact can induce an inclination in the vertical liquid jetting.
When a particle is attached under a liquid drop by surface tension, it forms a solid-liquid compound drop. We investigate experimentally the impact dynamics of this compound drop onto a solid surface. After impact, the particle rebounds from the solid surface and rises through the drop. The particle can either remain in the deposited liquid at low impact velocities or separate from the drop above a critical impact velocity. We demonstrate here that as the liquid viscosity increases, this separation threshold transitions from a capillary threshold, characterized by a critical particle Weber number, to a viscous threshold, captured by a critical particle Stokes number. However, the particle can still separate from the drop below this viscous limit if the particle is shifted away from the axis of symmetry before the impact of the compound drop. This shifting is observed experimentally at large falling heights, where the particle is destabilized by the air drag. In addition, we show that the shifting of the particle can also induce an inclination in the vertical liquid jetting, with a tangent of its angle proportional to the shifting distance of the particle. Finally, we confirm the focusing mechanism responsible for this liquid jetting by combining the observations of two synchronized cameras, from side view and bottom view.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据