4.7 Article

Femtoscopic correlation function for the Tcc(3875)+ state

期刊

PHYSICS LETTERS B
卷 846, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138201

关键词

Femtoscopy; Tcc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We conducted a study on the femtoscopic correlation functions for the D0D*+ and D+D*0 channels that form the Tcc state. By developing a formalism that factorizes the scattering amplitudes, we were able to calculate the integrals involving the strong interaction explicitly. Our results show that for a source size of 1 fm, the correlation functions for the D0D*+ and D+D*0 channels near the origin are approximately 30 and 2.5, respectively, and these observables converge to unity at a relative momentum of about 200 MeV. Our tests indicate that the correlation functions mostly provide information on the scattering length, but with higher precision measurements, the effective range of the D0D*+ channel could also be obtained.
We have conducted a study of the femtoscopic correlation functions for the D0D*+ and D+D*0 channels that build the Tcc state. We develop a formalism that allows us to factorize the scattering amplitudes outside the integrals in the formulas, and the integrals involve the range of the strong interaction explicitly. For a source of size of 1 fm, we find values for the correlation functions of the D0D*+ and D+D*0 channels at the origin around 30 and 2.5, respectively, and we see these observables converging to unity already for relative momenta of the order of 200 MeV. We conduct tests to see the relevance of the different contributions to the correlation function and find that it mostly provides information on the scattering length, but should the correlation functions be measured with the precision of the latest experiments, the effective range of the D0D*+ could also be obtained. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons .org /licenses /by /4 .0/). Funded by SCOAP3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据