4.6 Article

Phase transition of polarons in bilayer graphene nanoribbons

期刊

PHYSICA SCRIPTA
卷 98, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1402-4896/acecc2

关键词

bilayer; quasiparticle; polaron; graphene nanoribbon; interlayer coupling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stacking graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) is a natural way to obtain semiconductors with exotic quantum phenomena. A recent report shows that interlayer coupling has a significant influence on phonon modes during charge transport. Therefore, a reliable physical description of charged carriers must consider the coupling between electronic and lattice phenomena.
Stacking graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) is the natural path to obtain semiconductors with exotic quantum phenomena by manipulating the interlayer coupling. Recently, a report demonstrated that, during charge transport, interlayer coupling significantly affects the phonon breathing modes. Therefore, a reliable physical description of charged carriers must explicitly address the coupling nature of the electronic and lattice phenomena. In this work, we gauge the influence of interlayer coupling (t (& BOTTOM;)) on the formation of charged carriers in a bilayer of an armchair graphene nanoribbon using a model Hamiltonian with electron-phonon coupling. We find different quasiparticle solutions depending on the t (& BOTTOM;) magnitude. As it increases, the carrier's charge progressively delocalizes along the layers, resulting in two interlayer polaron morphologies: the non-symmetric (0 meV 45 meV). These solutions also manifest in the band structure through first-order electronic phase transitions in the intragap states with a significant energy shift of about 0.3 eV. Consequently, the carrier's mobility and effective mass are expected to be highly sensitive to t (& BOTTOM;), suggesting that mechanical stress can regulate the mechanism. The findings extend to other GNR bilayers, potentially inspiring the development of novel nanoelectronics based on highly confined stacked systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据