4.6 Article

Structural, optical, and dielectric characteristics of pulsed laser deposited SnO2-TiO2 composite thin films

期刊

PHYSICA SCRIPTA
卷 98, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1402-4896/ace569

关键词

thin films; PLD; (XRD) x-ray diffraction; UV-Vis; hall effect measurements; dielectric properties; universal dielectric response (UDR) model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pulsed laser deposition was used to fabricate SnO2 and SnO2-TiO2 composite thin films on FTO substrates. The addition of TiO2 affected the structural, optical, dielectric, and ac conductivity of the films at room temperature. The composite films had a higher band gap energy and exhibited blue emission bands due to oxygen vacancies or interstitial oxygen ions and defect-related states.
Pulsed laser deposition was used to fabricate the thin films of SnO2 and SnO2-TiO2 composites on FTO substrates and these films were characterized to understand the effect of TiO2 on the structural, optical, and electrical properties of SnO2. The Tauc plots confirm that the composite films have a higher band gap energy than SnO2. EDX spectra demonstrate that the thin films contain Ti, Sn, and O ions. The photoluminescence (PL) spectra indicate three blue emission bands at wavelengths of 410, 435, and 460 nm and these are due to the oxygen vacancies or interstitial oxygen ions and defect-related states. These films are n-type semiconductors as verified by the Hall Effect measurements. At the interface of the film, the frequency dependence of the dielectric at room temperature reveals that as the frequency increases, the dielectric constant and dielectric losses decrease. SnO2 film has a significantly higher a.c. conductivity than the SnO2-TiO2 composite films. The correlated barrier hopping (CBH) mechanism is responsible for the conduction behaviour and obeys Johncher's power law (n < 1). The addition of TiO2 in SnO2 affects the structural, optical, dielectric, and ac conductivity of films at room temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据