4.5 Article

Appropriateness of HSE06 exchange-correlation energies for post transition metal sesquioxides Ga2O3 and In2O3: Peculiarities in electronic states, momentum densities and thermoluminescence

期刊

PHYSICA B-CONDENSED MATTER
卷 666, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2023.415129

关键词

Compton scattering; Electronic structure; LCAO; Density functional theory; X-ray scattering; Post transition metal oxides

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compton scattering measurements were conducted using 59.54 keV γ-rays on Ga2O3 and In2O3 sesquioxides. By considering different exchange and correlation potentials within density functional theory and its hybridisation with Hartree-Fock (PBESOL0 and HSE06), it was found that HSE06 was a better choice for both sesquioxides. The band structures of In2O3 exhibited prominent trapping centers and direct band gaps, suggesting its potential applications in thermoluminescence dosimeters.
Compton scattering measurements using 59.54 keV & gamma;-rays have been reported for sesquioxides Ga2O3 and In2O3. To precisely compare the experimental and theoretical momentum densities, different exchange and correlation potentials within density functional theory and its hybridisation with Hartree-Fock (PBESOL0 and HSE06) have been considered. x2 fitting analysis depicts HSE06 as a better choice for both sesquioxides. Present band structures, density of states and UV-vis measurements unambiguously support the use of HSE06 for such oxides and resolves issues related to appropriateness of exchange and correlation potentials. Higher covalent character in Ga2O3 than In2O3 using Mulliken's population is well explained by equal-valence-electron-density scaled CPs. Most prominent and firstly reported features in band structures of In2O3 are presence of parabolic trapping centres at & UGamma;, H and N points with three direct band gaps of similar energy (3.37 eV), which may lead to its higher luminescence properties including potential applications in thermoluminescence dosimeters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据