4.7 Article

Mechanism of foraging selections regulated by gustatory receptor 43a in Ostrinia furnacalis larvae

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/ps.7828

关键词

Ostrinia furnacalis; neuropeptide F; gustatory receptor; Gr43a; feeding regulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified a gustatory receptor, Gr43a, in Ostrinia furnacalis larvae, which plays a role in discriminating between nutritious and non-nutritious substances. The Gr43a is negatively regulated by the neuropeptide F system and offers insight into feeding strategies for animals to meet nutritional needs and gratification.
BACKGROUND Omnivores, including humans, have an inborn tendency to avoid risky or non-nutritious foods. However, relatively little is known about how animals perceive and discriminate nutritious foods from risky substances. In this study, we explored the mechanism of feeding selection in Ostrinia furnacalis larvae, one of the most destructive pests to the maize crop.RESULTS We identified a gustatory receptor, Gr43a, for feeding regulation in larvae of Ostrinia furnacalis, which highly expresses in the mouthparts of the first- (the period of just hatching out from eggs) and fifth-instar larvae (the period of gluttony). The Gr43a regulates foraging plasticity by discriminating sorbitol, a nonsweet nutritious substance, and sucralose, a sweet non-nutritious substance through the labra of mouthparts, while it differentiates fructose/sucrose and sucralose via the sensilla styloconica of mouthparts. Specially, Gr43a responds to fructose and sucrose via the medial and lateral sensilla styloconica in O. furnacalis, respectively. Furthermore, Gr43a is negatively regulated by the neuropeptide F system, a homologous mammalian neuropeptide Y system.CONCLUSION This study reveals a smart feeding strategy for animals to meet both nutritional needs and sweet gratification, and offers an insight into complex feeding selections dependent on food resources in the surrounding environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据