4.7 Article

Functional diversity of voltage-gated sodium channel in Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura)

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/ps.7786

关键词

Drosophila suzukii; voltage-gated sodium channel; alternative splicing; RNA editing; electrophysiological

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sodium channel of Drosophila suzukii was cloned and found to have diverse gating properties and RNA editing.
BACKGROUND: The larvae of Drosophila suzukii Matsumura feed directly inside the fruit, causing catastrophic damage to orchards. The misuse of pyrethroid insecticides during the control period has led to increasing resistance of D. suzukii to pyrethroids acting on the voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC).RESULTS: In this study, the sodium channel of D. suzukii was cloned (DsNav5 GenBank number: OQ871532). The results of multiple-sequence alignment showed that the homology of sodium channel between D. suzukii and Drosophila melanogaster was as high as 95.3%. Analysis of transcripts from 62 variants of D. suzukii VGSC revealed a total of six alternative splicing sites (exons u, j, a, b, e, and h) and 33 RNA editing. Exons j, a, b, e, and h are conserved in D. melanogaster and other insects, whereas exon u has never been reported before. The number of A-to-I was distinctly more than that of U-to-C for RNA editing. All D. suzukii VGSC variants were expressed in Xenopus oocytes, but only one (type 5) was able to produce robust currents and nine produce weak currents. DsNav5 with TipE of D. melanogaster co-expresses current better than its own TipE. Subsequently, tetrodotoxin was verified to be a blocker of VGSC, and the gating properties of DsNav5 were investigated.CONCLUSION: These findings proved that the VGSC of D. suzukii has not only the basic gating properties, but also the diversity of gating properties. This study also laid a foundation for the study of pyrethroid resistance mechanism of VGSC in D. suzukii.(c) 2023 Society of Chemical Industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据