4.7 Article

Mineral matter interactions during co-pyrolysis of coal and biomass and their impact on intrinsic char co-gasification reactivity

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 279, 期 -, 页码 402-408

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.05.057

关键词

Co-pyrolysis; Co-gasification; Biomass; Coal; Reaction kinetics; Renewable energy

资金

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gasification of blends of biomass and coal can offer renewable fuels the scale and extent of deployment usually associated with fossil fuels. For significant penetration of renewables, however, co-utilization of significant quantities of biomass is required, which significantly impacts process performance. At a fundamental level, char reactivity affects many practical aspects of gasifier operation, and is complicated by the influence of blends of coal and biomass and their different behaviour during devolatilization. In this work, intrinsic gasification reaction kinetics of chars from biomass and coal mixtures with different proportions were studied: one set of chars produced separately and mixed prior to gasification; and another with chars produced from co-pyrolysis of biomass-coal blends. Lower specific and intrinsic rates were observed for the samples where the biomass and coal were pyrolyzed together than when they were pyrolyzed separately, suggesting some interaction during devolatilization that affects reactivity behaviour. XRD results showed that the catalytically-active calcium species in the biomass interacted with the aluminosilicate species in the coal mineral matter to form Ca2Al2SiO7 (gehlenite) crystals, which are catalytically inert. The conversion of catalytically-active Ca to catalytically-inactive Ca may have led to lower reactivity of co-pyrolyzed mixtures, highlighting the importance of understanding the type and nature of often catalytically-active species when investigating the gasification behaviour of blends of coal and biomass materials. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据